WWE Officially Files Motion To Dismiss MLW’s Lawsuit

WWE has filed to dismiss Major League Wrestling‘s lawsuit against the company.

On January 14, WWE was officially served with MLW’s lawsuit, which alleged that the promotion has attempted to form a monopoly in the wrestling world and hinder its competitors.

On March 15, WWE officially filed a motion to dismiss the suit by arguing that MLW did not successfully plead “a facially sustainable relevant market, monopoly power or anticompetitive conduct, or antitrust injury.” Additionally, WWE claimed that “MLW’s claim for intentional interference with contractual relations is unsupported by factual allegations, and what allegations
MW pleads are entirely implausible.”

Plus, in the motion for dismissal, WWE argues that MLW’s argument that WWE allegedly interfered in its negotiations for an agreement with a third-party platform was insufficient because “MLW does not allege that WWE knew about MLW’s negotiations to sell a third party first-run programming, nor does MW plausibly allege that WWE’s alleged single communication with the third party influenced its decision not to purchase MLW’s content.”

Finally, WWE moved to dismiss the complaint about the lack of personal jurisdiction because the suit was filed in California, and neither party is a resident of the state.

The summary, courtesy of Brandon Thurston of Wrestlenomics, is as follows:

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 29. 2022. or as soon thereafter as this matter
may be heard, either in Courtroom 4 of this Court, located at 280 South 1st Street, San Jose.
California 95113, or by videoconference or teleconference (if the Court prefers), Defendant World
Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (WWE”) will and hereby does move the Court for an order granting
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff MLW Media LLC’s (“MLW”) Complaint with prejudice.
The grounds for dismissal are as follows:

First, WWE moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss MLW’.
federal antitrust claim because MW failed to plausibly plead (1) a facially sustainable relevant
market, (2) monopoly power or anticompetitive conduct, or (3) antitrust injury. WWE further
moves to dismiss MLW’s remaining state law claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(1) because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over them if the federal antitrust claim
is dismissed.

Second, WWE moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(bY6) to dismiss all
state law claims should this Court exercises jurisdiction over them. MLW’s claim for intentional
interference with contractual relations is unsupported by factual allegations, and what allegations
MW pleads are entirely implausible. MLW’s claim for intentional interference with prospective
economic advantage fails because MLW does not allege that WWE knew about MLW’s
negotiations to sell a third party first-run programming, nor does MW plausibly allege that
WWE’s alleged single communication with the third party influenced its decision not to purchase
MLW’s content. Finally, MLW’s unfair competition claim fails because (1) it is not tethered to
some other viable antitrust or tort claim, and (2) MW lacks Article III and statutory standing to
assert such a claim.

Finally, WWE moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) to dismiss
MLW’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction because neither party is a resident of California,
no harm specific to California is alleged, and none of the alleged misconduct took place in
California.

WrestleZone will provide more information as it becomes available.

RELATED: Big E Returns Home After Suffering Broken Neck On 3/11 WWE SmackDown